Enigma 1779

Spoiler for New Scientist Enigma 1779 “Four triangles”  (Follow the link to see the puzzle.)

Edited to correct two omissions, one pointed out by Jim Olson.

Is there an easier way to do this than to find or build a list of all Pythagorean triples with hypotenuse < 100 and start looking through it?

I find four chains of four if you allow the hypotenuse of each smaller triangle to be either leg of the next:

  • 9-12-15 / 15-20-25 / 25-60-65 / 65-72-97
  • 9-12-15 / 15-36-39 / 39-52-65 / 65-72-97
  • 12-16-20 / 15-20-25 / 25-60-65 / 65-72-97
  • 12-16-20 / 20-48-52 / 39-52-65 / 65-72-97

and the first two satisfy the requirement that the hypotenuse of the smaller triangle be the smaller leg of the next. In either case, the smallest and largest sides are 9 and 97.

Here’s a diagram of the second of these:

Screen Shot 2013-12-11 at 11.33.04 PM

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Enigma 1779

  1. You missed a series that satisfies the conditions:
    9,12,15 ; 15,20,25 ; 25,60,65 and 65,72,97.
    Both series give the same solution: 9mm and 97mm.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s